C O N F I D E N T I A L LA PAZ 001018
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/03/2018
TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PTER, ECON, EINV, EPET, IT, BL
SUBJECT: EVO'S MAY DAY DECREES AND REMARKS
Classified By: EcoPol Chief Mike Hammer for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
1. (U) Summary: Speaking to a relatively small crowd of a few
thousand on May 1, Bolivian President Evo Morales announced
the state would "take immediate control" of Italian-owned
telecommunications company Entel and three foreign-owned
hydrocarbon companies (septel). Morales tried to soften the
blow to private businesses by assuring them he is open to
working with them, so long as they act "as partners, not
owners." Business and political leaders have been slow to
react to the "nationalizations." Although he commented that
the State Department Country Reports on Terrorism "didn't
matter" to him, he criticized the U.S. authority to opine on
terrorism given U.S. troops in Iraq (misidentified as Iran)
and then equated capitalism with economic terrorism. Morales
also focused on themes of anti-corruption, the difficulty of
undoing "the last 500 years," and labor rights. End Summary.
Entel Nationalized as a "Basic Service"
----------------------------------------
2. (U) Morales decreed (DS 29544) the nationalization of
leading Bolivian telecommunications company Entel, which is
owned by Telecom Italia. Morales characterized
telecommunication as a "basic service" that required
government control. He likened Entel to a natural resources
such as water or energy that "should not have owners," but
instead should belong "to the people." Morales has promised
to keep existing staff, but warned Entel employees not to
fight the move. The government posted police at Entel
offices (mimicking the May 1, 2006 troop deployment to gas
fields that accompanied the hydrocarbons nationalization
announcement), had Bolivian flags raised near entrances or
draped over Entel signs, and, in some cases, mobilized
supporters to hold placards supporting the "return of Entel
to the hands of the people." Entel was privatized in
1995-1996.
3. (U) The government has been vague about exactly how the
"nationalization" will move forward, which it plans to
finalize in the next 180 days. Minister of the Presidency
(Chief of Staff) Juan Ramon Quintana announced May 2 the
government has arrived at a "reasonable price" for Entel,
which it will announce in 60 days. Quintana said the
reorganization will result in 98 percent stock for the
government, with two percent reserved for employees. The
Superintendent of Telecommunications has assured Entel's 1.8
million subscribers uninterrupted service.
MASsive Potential for Intelligence/Media Abuse
--------------------------------------------- ---
4. (C) With the takeover of Entel, there is concern about the
government's acquired ability to control both television and
cellular phone transmissions. Beyond the ability to cut off
broadcasts at will, the threat of doing so could also push
media to self-censor critical coverage of the government.
Investors: Please Don't Go
--------------------------
5. (SBU) Morales also declared he was "taking control" of
three hydrocarbon companies (Chaco, Transredes, and CLHB;
septel), ending two years of negotiations with the companies
to gain a majority share of company stocks (dubbed
re-nationalization by the government). Morales tempered his
nationalization mania with a "guarantee" to continue
exploring and exploiting hydrocarbon fuels with investors
that "respect Bolivian norms and invest as partners."
Morales said Bolivia needs "true investment" and "partners,
not owners."
Opposition/Biz Reaction Still Developing
----------------------------------------
6. (C) The decrees appear to have been taken the opposition
and Entel by surprise. Opposition leaders are criticizing
the "so-called nationalizations" and opposition congressmen
stress that the deals require their approval. Entel contacts
tell us they were surprised by the decree and shocked by the
use of police to surround their facilities in an over-the-top
show of force. Business contacts speculate that ultimately
the decrees may be more political pageantry and an upping of
the ante than the actual end state of negotiations.
Terrorism Report "Does Not Matter to Me"
----------------------------------------
7. (SBU) Morales briefly mentioned the April 30 State
Department Country Reports on Terrorism, saying it was not
the first time the United States "has called us terrorists."
Morales said in 2002, he was characterized as "Bin Laden" and
his supporters in the coca unions as "Andean Taliban"
(remarks apparently made by then U.S. Ambassador Manuel
Rocha). It was not clear who or what was the source of the
alleged accusation. "With all due respect," Morales said the
United States had no credibility to opine on terrorism in
foreign countries due to its "troops in Iran" (an apparent
mix-up with Iraq which was repeated by the official
government news agency ABI) and the "economic terrorism"
inflicted by U.S.-sponsored "savage capitalism." The report
"does not matter to me. Let them continue accusing." (Note:
Government Minister Alfredo Rada also criticized the report
as not serious, inconsistent, and a demonstration that the
U.S. is partial to opposition prefects. Rada also repeated
the accusation that Ambassador Goldberg is behind a
conspiracy against the government. End Note.)
Other Themes: Overcoming 500 years
----------------------------------
8. (U) Morales stressed combating government corruption
throughout his speech. "That money does not belong to
government officials, it belongs to the people." He often
tried to manage expectations, highlighting government
achievements and explaining it was impossible to solve in the
two years of his administration problems that have developed
over 500 years. Morales also decreed changes to labor
dispute resolution and labor union election laws.
Comment
-------
9. (C) May 1 is becoming synonymous with unilateral
government takeovers of privatized businesses. It could have
been worse (for us). The decrees do not impact U.S. mining
interests and U.S. firms have little stake in the take-over
of the three nationalized hydrocarbon concerns. A feared
announcement restricting or banning USAID's Democracy Program
did not materialize. The Europeans bear the brunt of the
"nationalizations." The takeovers provide Morales some
ostensibly concrete take-aways for his base to distract from
the May 4 Santa Cruz autonomy referendum and high inflation.
On corruption, it appeared Morales was more concerned with
spreading blame for unfulfilled promises than advancing any
tangible measures to combat graft. His message: others are
wasting the increased bounty I have brought Bolivians.
Although Morales did comment on Bolivia's entry in the
terrorism report, he was more dismissive than inflammatory.
End Comment.
GOLDBERG