Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/10 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11 2011/03/13 2011/03/14 2011/03/15 2011/03/16 2011/03/17 2011/03/18 2011/03/19 2011/03/20 2011/03/21 2011/03/22 2011/03/23 2011/03/24 2011/03/25 2011/03/26 2011/03/27 2011/03/28 2011/03/29 2011/03/30 2011/03/31
2011/04/01 2011/04/02 2011/04/03 2011/04/04 2011/04/05 2011/04/06 2011/04/07 2011/04/08 2011/04/09 2011/04/10 2011/04/11 2011/04/12 2011/04/13 2011/04/14 2011/04/15 2011/04/16 2011/04/17 2011/04/18 2011/04/19 2011/04/20 2011/04/21 2011/04/22 2011/04/23 2011/04/24 2011/04/25 2011/04/26 2011/04/27 2011/04/28 2011/04/29 2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Apia Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Auckland Consulate Amsterdam Consulate Adana American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belmopan Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Ciudad Juarez Consulate Chennai Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dili Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Ho Chi Minh City Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamilton Consulate Hamburg Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kingston Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kathmandu Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy La Paz Consulate Lahore Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE Mission USNATO Mission UNESCO Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maputo Embassy Manila Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Mumbai Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia Embassy Niamey Embassy New Delhi Embassy Ndjamena Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Naples Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Of Spain Embassy Port Louis Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Suva Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate St Petersburg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sapporo Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn Consulate Toronto Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Office Almaty US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Embassy Valletta Consulate Vladivostok Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU ASEC AE AF AORC AEMR AMGT ABUD AFFAIRS APER AS AMED AY AG AR AJ AL AID AM AODE ABLD AMG AFIN ATRN AGAO AFU AN AA ALOW APECO ADM ARF ASEAN APEC AMBASSADOR AO ASUP AZ AADP ACOA ANET AMCHAMS ACABQ ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG APCS AGMT AINF AIT AORL ACS AFSI AFSN ACBAQ AFGHANISTAN ADANA ADPM AX ADCO AECL AMEX ACAO ASCH AORG AGR AROC ASIG AND ARM AQ ATFN AC AUC ASEX AER AVERY AGRICULTURE
BL BR BO BA BD BM BK BG BU BB BH BTIO BY BEXP BP BE BRUSSELS BF BIDEN BT BX BC BILAT BN BBSR BTIU BWC BMGT
CA CASC CVIS CM CH CO CU CD CWC CI CS CY CMGT CF CG CR CB CV CW CE CBW CT CPAS COUNTERTERRORISM CJAN CODEL CIDA CDG CDC CIA CTR CNARC CSW CN CONS CLINTON COE CROS CARICOM CONDOLEEZZA COUNTER CL COM CICTE CIS CFED COUNTRY CJUS CBSA CEUDA CLMT CAC COPUOS CIC CBE CHR CTM CVR CITEL CLEARANCE CACS CAN CITT CARSON CACM CDB CAPC CKGR CBC
EC EG EPET ECON ETRD EFIN EIND EMIN ENRG EAID EAGR EUN ETTC EAIR ENIV ES EU EINV ELAB ECIN EFIS ELTN EWWT ECPS ECONOMIC ENGR EN EINT EPA ELN ESA EZ ER ET EFTA EINVECONSENVCSJA EUMEM ETRA EXTERNAL EI EUR EK ERNG ENGY ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS ENERG EINVEFIN ENVR ECA ELECTIONS ETC EUREM ENNP EFINECONCS EURN ECINECONCS EEPET EXIM ERD ENVI ETRC ETRDEINVTINTCS ETRO EDU ETRN EAIG ECONCS ECONOMICS EAP ECONOMY EINN EIAR EXBS ECUN EINDETRD EREL EUC ESENV ECONEFIN ECIP EFIM EAIDS ETRDECONWTOCS EUNCH EINVETC
IZ IT IR IS IN IC IAEA IO ICAO IWC ID IV ISRAEL IAHRC IQ ICTR IMF IRS IDP IGAD ICRC ICTY IMO IL INRA INRO ICJ ITU IBRD INMARSAT IIP ITALY IEFIN IACI ILO INTELSAT ILC ITRA IDA INRB IRC INTERPOL IA IPR IRAQI ISRAELI INTERNAL ISLAMISTS INDO ITPHUM ITPGOV ITALIAN IBET INR IEA IZPREL IRAJ ITF IF
KDEM KU KPAL KNNP KCRM KZ KN KS KJUS KTFN KSCA KV KISL KPAO KPKO KIRF KTIA KIPR KFLO KFRD KTIP KAWC KSUM KCOM KAID KE KTDB KMDR KOMC KWBG KDRG KVPR KTEX KGIC KWMN KSCI KCOR KACT KDDG KHLS KSAF KFLU KSEO KMRS KSPR KOLY KSEP KVIR KGHG KIRC KUNR KIFR KCIP KMCA KMPI KBCT KHSA KICC KIDE KCRS KMFO KRVC KRGY KR KAWK KG KFIN KHIV KBIO KOCI KBTR KNEI KPOA KCFE KPLS KSTC KHDP KPRP KCRCM KLIG KCFC KTER KREC KTBT KPRV KSTH KRIM KRAD KWAC KWMM KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KOMS KX KMIG KRCM KVRP KBTS KPAONZ KNUC KNAR KPWR KNPP KDEMAF KNUP KNNPMNUC KERG KGIT KPAI KTLA KFSC KCSY KSAC KTRD KID KOM KMOC KJUST KGCC KREL KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KFTFN KO KNSD KHUM KSEC KCMR KCHG KICA KPIN KESS KDEV KCGC KWWMN KPAK KWNM KWMNCS KRFD
MOPS MCAP MPOS MARR MO MNUC MX MASS MG MY MU ML MR MILITARY MTCRE MT MEPP MA MDC MP MAR MASSMNUC MARAD MAPP MZ MD MI MEETINGS MK MCC MEPN MRCRE MAS MIL MASC MC MV MTCR MIK MUCN MEDIA MERCOSUR MW MOPPS MTS MLS MILI MTRE MEPI MQADHAFI MAPS
NO NATO NL NP NZ NSF NI NH NG NAFTA NU NASA NR NATOPREL NSSP NSG NA NT NW NK NPT NPA NATIONAL NPG NSFO NS NSC NE NGO NDP NIPP NRR NEW NZUS NC NAR NV NORAD
OTRA OPCW OVIP OAS OREP OPIC OIIP OPRC ODIP OEXC OPDC OSCE OIC OSCI OECD OFDP OFDA OMIG OPAD OFFICIALS OVP OIE OHUM OCS OBSP OTR OSAC ON OCII OES
PGOV PREL PHUM PTER PINS PINR PREF PK PROP PA PARM PBTS PMAR PM PGIV PE PRAM PHUH PHSA PL PNAT PO PLN PAO PSA PHUMPGOV PF PEL PBIO POLITICS PHUMBA PAS POL PREO PAHO PMIL POGOV POV PAK PNR PRL PG PREFA PSI PINL PU PARMS PRGOV PALESTINIAN PAIGH POLITICAL PARTIES POSTS PROG PORG PTBS PUNE POLICY PDOV PCI PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PP PS PY PTERE PGOF PKFK PSOE PEPR PPA PINT PRELP PSEPC PGOVE PINF PNG PGOC PFOR PCUL POLINT PGGV PHALANAGE PARTY PGOVLO PHUS PDEM PECON PROV PHUMPREL
RS RU RELATIONS RW RO RM RP ROOD RICE RUPREL RSO RCMP REACTION REPORT REGION RIGHTS RF RFE RSP RIGHTSPOLMIL ROBERT
SU SCUL SNAR SOCI SF SA SHUM SENV SP SR SY SANC SC SMIG SZ SARS SW SEVN SO SEN SL SNARCS SNARN SI SG SN SH SYR SAARC SPCE SHI SCRS SENVKGHG SYRIA SWE STEINBERG SIPRS ST SNARIZ SSA SK SPCVIS SOFA SIPDIS SAN
TC TI TBIO TH TSPL TRGY TSPA TPHY TU TW TS TAGS TK TX TNGD TZ TF TL TV TN TD TIP TR TP TO TT TFIN THPY TERRORISM TINT TRSY TURKEY TBID
US UK UNGA UP UZ UNMIK USTR UNO UNSC UN UNESCO UNAUS UNHRC UY UG UNHCR UNCND USOAS USEU UNICEF UNEP UV UNPUOS UNCSD USUN UNCHR UNDC USNC UE UNDP UNC USPS USAID UNVIE UAE UNFICYP UNODC UNCHS UNIDROIT UNDESCO UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 03OTTAWA723, DISTANT NEIGHBORS, NORTHERN STYLE: CANADIAN
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03OTTAWA723.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03OTTAWA723 | 2003-03-14 21:45 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000723
SIPDIS
HOMELAND SECURITY FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KPAO KPLS CA
SUBJECT: DISTANT NEIGHBORS, NORTHERN STYLE: CANADIAN
OPINION OF THE U.S.
¶1. Summary and Conclusion. International debate on the war
on terrorism and impending war in Iraq has raised serious
concern about "What the World Thinks" about the United
States and its foreign policies. This is as true for Canada
as for the rest of the world. Canada is our largest trading
partner; shares our longest land border; and has been a
close ally in two world wars, the Cold War and in the war on
terrorism. Implementation of new security measures post 9-
11, such as NSEERS and visa requirements for Commonwealth
Landed Immigrants in Canada, as well as perennial bilateral
trade issues, have given us additional reason to ask how
Canadians perceive us.
¶2. This is the first in a series of cables that attempts to
assess Canadian opinion of the U.S. and public support in
Canada for U.S. policies. This report reviews the findings
of three recent, publicly released Canadian public opinion
polls. These polls indicate that we still enjoy a reservoir
of good will with most Canadians. But the polls also
indicate that the international environment post 9-11 has
drawn heavily on that good will. The U.S. has a broad and
complex policy agenda in which Canadian opinion matters.
The opinion polling results suggest that, as we implement
our policy agenda, we will need to find ways effectively to
shore up public support from our nearest neighbors. End
Summary and Conclusion.
IRAQ: CANADIAN VIEWS ARE MIXED BUT GENERALLY SUPPORT
MILITARY ACTION ONLY IF SANCTIONED BY THE UN.
¶3. The most recent publicly released national poll was
conducted by the firm Ipsos-Reid on February 28 2003. It
finds a slim majority (51 percent) of Canadians saying that
the UN Security Council has enough evidence to authorize
military action against Iraq. This is a small but
significant shift from a poll conducted 10 days earlier in
which 52 percent of Canadians said that there was not enough
evidence to authorize an attack.
¶4. This does not mean that a majority of Canadians support
the U.S. position on Iraq. 62 per cent of Canadians in the
Feb 28 survey continue to believe that Canada should support
more time for UN inspectors in Iraq to complete their
mission. 62 percent of Canadians also say that Canada
should provide assistance for military action in Iraq only
if the UN decides military action is required.
¶5. Only 32 percent of Canadians feel Canada should support
U.S. and U.K. calls for immediate military action to remove
Saddam Hussein from power. Even fewer - 18 percent - say
that Canada should provide military assistance if the U.S.
decides that military action is required in Iraq without UN
authorization. Another 18 percent of Canadians feel that
Canada should provide no military assistance for any action
in Iraq, even if authorized by the UN.
REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN CANADIAN PERCEPTIONS
¶6. Canada's regions exhibit differing patterns of support
for the U.S. position on Iraq. The view that the UN
Security Council now has enough evidence to authorize
military action against Iraq is shared by at least half of
the residents in each region except in Quebec, where only 34
percent of Canadians hold this view. When Quebec is removed
from the national polling, agreement among Canadians rises
to 57 percent.
¶7. Of all Canadians, Albertans exhibit the highest level of
support; 70 percent believe the UN has sufficient evidence
to authorize military action. Other western Canadians,
however, are more strongly opposed. In Saskatchewan and
Manitoba, 67 percent (up from 53 percent in the earlier
poll) now say that Canada should support more time for UN
inspectors. Only 28 percent (down from 42 percent in the
earlier poll) say that Canada should support the U.S./U.K.
position on the need for military action in Iraq.
A BASELINE OF CANADIAN OPINION OF THE U.S. - THE PEW CENTER
STUDY.
¶8. The Pew Center Study, published at the end of 2002, has
been widely discussed in U.S. and foreign media, including
the media in Canada. The study received relatively little
attention on a country-by-country basis, however. The
Study, conducted in July 2002, shows that Canadians hold
positive attitudes about the U.S. At 72 percent favorable,
Canadians held a more positive image of the U.S. than almost
any other country (among traditional allies, only the U.K.
was more positive at 75 percent). That rating by Canadians
was up one percentage point, from 71 percent, in the
previous year's survey.
¶9. The Pew Center Study also indicates that Canadians and
Americans are alike in many of their national perceptions.
They express remarkably similar satisfaction with their own
lives. 67 percent of Canadians and 64 per cent of Americans
are satisfied with their personal lives, far higher levels
of satisfaction than in other industrialized western
nations. Canadians and Americans also express similar views
of "progress" in their countries over the past five years
(51 percent among Americans, 48 percent among Canadians).
And they express similar levels of "optimism" about the
future (61 per cent among Americans and 54 per cent among
Canadians). Americans and Canadians are significantly more
optimistic about the future than are western Europeans.
¶10. Yet there are significant differences in American and
Canadian perceptions of specific issue areas on the world
scene. 50 percent of Americans identify terrorism as a
"very big" problem; only 19 percent of Canadians expressed
that concern. The Pew Study found a duality of opinion
among the U.S.' closest allies in their support for the war
against terrorism. Canadian opinion fits that pattern: 68
per cent of Canadians supported the U.S. led war on
terrorism; but only 25 percent of Canadians believed that
U.S. foreign policy "considers others" when making
international policy decisions, including decisions about
countering international terrorism.
¶11. Canadians are critical of the U.S. in the economic
sphere. 68 percent of Canadians believe that the U.S. does
"too little to solve problems related to the gap between
rich and poor countries." On issues of pollution and the
environment, nearly twice as many Canadians as Americans are
"worried" (44 per cent vs. 23 per cent). While 50 percent
of Canadians like "American ideas about democracy," 56
percent of Canadians dislike "American ideas about business
practices."
¶12. Canadians have mixed views of U.S. cultural influence
but they are far less critical than Europeans. 54 per cent
of Canadians expressed the sentiment that the "spread of
American ideas and customs" was bad. This compares with 71
percent in France, 67 percent in Germany and 68 percent in
Russia. Yet 77 percent of Canadians "like" American popular
culture. This compares with 66 percent in France and
Germany and only 42 percent in Russia.
¶13. Among western countries, only in Canada does a strong
majority (77 per cent) express a positive view of
immigration. Among other major industrial countries,
Americans show the next highest level of support for
immigration; but at 49 percent, American support for
immigration is far lower than Canadian.
CANADIAN OPINION UPDATE: A NEGATIVE SHIFT?
¶14. The Pew Center in Canada was conducted by the Environics
Research Group in July, 2002. The same firm conducted a
separate poll with a different set of respondents in
February 2003. The two polls were not designed to be
strictly inter-comparable. Nevertheless, the findings of
the later poll may suggest a negative shift in Canadian
perceptions of the U.S. The overall Canadian attitude
toward the U.S. remained favorable. But at 62 percent, it
was considerably lower than in August 2002.
A majority of Quebecers - 54 per cent - for the first time
held an unfavorable opinion of the U.S., a 20 percent drop
since August 2002.
¶15. The polling data from Quebec suggests that, despite the
decline of separatism as a political issue, there is still a
significant anglophone/francophone division of opinion on
international issues. This is particularly interesting as
Quebecers often have been viewed as more pro-American than
other Canadians - particularly in Ontario - because of wide
support for free trade and American culture. In another
twist, the latest poll finds Canadians overall holding more
positive views of both the U.K. and France than of the U.S.
77 percent of Canadians hold a favorable view of the U.K.
compared to 69 percent for France and 62 percent for the
U.S. The favorable rating for France in Quebec was 80
percent compared with 62 percent for the U.K. and 40 percent
for the U.S.
¶16. COMMENT. These polling results indicate that Canadian
perceptions of the U.S. are mixed and dynamic, and that they
exhibit significant regional differences. Future cables
will attempt to assess more anecdotally the extent to which
Canadian perceptions may reflect deeper sentiments in favor
of peace and in favor of multi-lateral action; and the
extent to which such sentiments may translate into "anti-
American" feelings. END COMMENT. Cellucci