Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/10 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11 2011/03/13 2011/03/14 2011/03/15 2011/03/16 2011/03/17 2011/03/18 2011/03/19 2011/03/20 2011/03/21 2011/03/22 2011/03/23 2011/03/24 2011/03/25 2011/03/26 2011/03/27 2011/03/28 2011/03/29 2011/03/30 2011/03/31
2011/04/01 2011/04/02 2011/04/03 2011/04/04 2011/04/05 2011/04/06 2011/04/07 2011/04/08 2011/04/09 2011/04/10 2011/04/11 2011/04/12 2011/04/13 2011/04/14 2011/04/15 2011/04/16 2011/04/17 2011/04/18 2011/04/19 2011/04/20 2011/04/21 2011/04/22 2011/04/23 2011/04/24 2011/04/25 2011/04/26 2011/04/27 2011/04/28 2011/04/29 2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Apia Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Auckland Consulate Amsterdam Consulate Adana American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belmopan Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Ciudad Juarez Consulate Chennai Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dili Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Ho Chi Minh City Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamilton Consulate Hamburg Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kingston Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kathmandu Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy La Paz Consulate Lahore Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE Mission USNATO Mission UNESCO Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maputo Embassy Manila Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Mumbai Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia Embassy Niamey Embassy New Delhi Embassy Ndjamena Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Naples Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Of Spain Embassy Port Louis Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Suva Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate St Petersburg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sapporo Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn Consulate Toronto Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Office Almaty US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Embassy Valletta Consulate Vladivostok Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU ASEC AE AF AORC AEMR AMGT ABUD AFFAIRS APER AS AMED AY AG AR AJ AL AID AM AODE ABLD AMG AFIN ATRN AGAO AFU AN AA ALOW APECO ADM ARF ASEAN APEC AMBASSADOR AO ASUP AZ AADP ACOA ANET AMCHAMS ACABQ ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG APCS AGMT AINF AIT AORL ACS AFSI AFSN ACBAQ AFGHANISTAN ADANA ADPM AX ADCO AECL AMEX ACAO ASCH AORG AGR AROC ASIG AND ARM AQ ATFN AC AUC ASEX AER AVERY AGRICULTURE
BL BR BO BA BD BM BK BG BU BB BH BTIO BY BEXP BP BE BRUSSELS BF BIDEN BT BX BC BILAT BN BBSR BTIU BWC BMGT
CA CASC CVIS CM CH CO CU CD CWC CI CS CY CMGT CF CG CR CB CV CW CE CBW CT CPAS COUNTERTERRORISM CJAN CODEL CIDA CDG CDC CIA CTR CNARC CSW CN CONS CLINTON COE CROS CARICOM CONDOLEEZZA COUNTER CL COM CICTE CIS CFED COUNTRY CJUS CBSA CEUDA CLMT CAC COPUOS CIC CBE CHR CTM CVR CITEL CLEARANCE CACS CAN CITT CARSON CACM CDB CAPC CKGR CBC
EC EG EPET ECON ETRD EFIN EIND EMIN ENRG EAID EAGR EUN ETTC EAIR ENIV ES EU EINV ELAB ECIN EFIS ELTN EWWT ECPS ECONOMIC ENGR EN EINT EPA ELN ESA EZ ER ET EFTA EINVECONSENVCSJA EUMEM ETRA EXTERNAL EI EUR EK ERNG ENGY ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS ENERG EINVEFIN ENVR ECA ELECTIONS ETC EUREM ENNP EFINECONCS EURN ECINECONCS EEPET EXIM ERD ENVI ETRC ETRDEINVTINTCS ETRO EDU ETRN EAIG ECONCS ECONOMICS EAP ECONOMY EINN EIAR EXBS ECUN EINDETRD EREL EUC ESENV ECONEFIN ECIP EFIM EAIDS ETRDECONWTOCS EUNCH EINVETC
IZ IT IR IS IN IC IAEA IO ICAO IWC ID IV ISRAEL IAHRC IQ ICTR IMF IRS IDP IGAD ICRC ICTY IMO IL INRA INRO ICJ ITU IBRD INMARSAT IIP ITALY IEFIN IACI ILO INTELSAT ILC ITRA IDA INRB IRC INTERPOL IA IPR IRAQI ISRAELI INTERNAL ISLAMISTS INDO ITPHUM ITPGOV ITALIAN IBET INR IEA IZPREL IRAJ ITF IF
KDEM KU KPAL KNNP KCRM KZ KN KS KJUS KTFN KSCA KV KISL KPAO KPKO KIRF KTIA KIPR KFLO KFRD KTIP KAWC KSUM KCOM KAID KE KTDB KMDR KOMC KWBG KDRG KVPR KTEX KGIC KWMN KSCI KCOR KACT KDDG KHLS KSAF KFLU KSEO KMRS KSPR KOLY KSEP KVIR KGHG KIRC KUNR KIFR KCIP KMCA KMPI KBCT KHSA KICC KIDE KCRS KMFO KRVC KRGY KR KAWK KG KFIN KHIV KBIO KOCI KBTR KNEI KPOA KCFE KPLS KSTC KHDP KPRP KCRCM KLIG KCFC KTER KREC KTBT KPRV KSTH KRIM KRAD KWAC KWMM KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KOMS KX KMIG KRCM KVRP KBTS KPAONZ KNUC KNAR KPWR KNPP KDEMAF KNUP KNNPMNUC KERG KGIT KPAI KTLA KFSC KCSY KSAC KTRD KID KOM KMOC KJUST KGCC KREL KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KFTFN KO KNSD KHUM KSEC KCMR KCHG KICA KPIN KESS KDEV KCGC KWWMN KPAK KWNM KWMNCS KRFD
MOPS MCAP MPOS MARR MO MNUC MX MASS MG MY MU ML MR MILITARY MTCRE MT MEPP MA MDC MP MAR MASSMNUC MARAD MAPP MZ MD MI MEETINGS MK MCC MEPN MRCRE MAS MIL MASC MC MV MTCR MIK MUCN MEDIA MERCOSUR MW MOPPS MTS MLS MILI MTRE MEPI MQADHAFI MAPS
NO NATO NL NP NZ NSF NI NH NG NAFTA NU NASA NR NATOPREL NSSP NSG NA NT NW NK NPT NPA NATIONAL NPG NSFO NS NSC NE NGO NDP NIPP NRR NEW NZUS NC NAR NV NORAD
OTRA OPCW OVIP OAS OREP OPIC OIIP OPRC ODIP OEXC OPDC OSCE OIC OSCI OECD OFDP OFDA OMIG OPAD OFFICIALS OVP OIE OHUM OCS OBSP OTR OSAC ON OCII OES
PGOV PREL PHUM PTER PINS PINR PREF PK PROP PA PARM PBTS PMAR PM PGIV PE PRAM PHUH PHSA PL PNAT PO PLN PAO PSA PHUMPGOV PF PEL PBIO POLITICS PHUMBA PAS POL PREO PAHO PMIL POGOV POV PAK PNR PRL PG PREFA PSI PINL PU PARMS PRGOV PALESTINIAN PAIGH POLITICAL PARTIES POSTS PROG PORG PTBS PUNE POLICY PDOV PCI PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PP PS PY PTERE PGOF PKFK PSOE PEPR PPA PINT PRELP PSEPC PGOVE PINF PNG PGOC PFOR PCUL POLINT PGGV PHALANAGE PARTY PGOVLO PHUS PDEM PECON PROV PHUMPREL
RS RU RELATIONS RW RO RM RP ROOD RICE RUPREL RSO RCMP REACTION REPORT REGION RIGHTS RF RFE RSP RIGHTSPOLMIL ROBERT
SU SCUL SNAR SOCI SF SA SHUM SENV SP SR SY SANC SC SMIG SZ SARS SW SEVN SO SEN SL SNARCS SNARN SI SG SN SH SYR SAARC SPCE SHI SCRS SENVKGHG SYRIA SWE STEINBERG SIPRS ST SNARIZ SSA SK SPCVIS SOFA SIPDIS SAN
TC TI TBIO TH TSPL TRGY TSPA TPHY TU TW TS TAGS TK TX TNGD TZ TF TL TV TN TD TIP TR TP TO TT TFIN THPY TERRORISM TINT TRSY TURKEY TBID
US UK UNGA UP UZ UNMIK USTR UNO UNSC UN UNESCO UNAUS UNHRC UY UG UNHCR UNCND USOAS USEU UNICEF UNEP UV UNPUOS UNCSD USUN UNCHR UNDC USNC UE UNDP UNC USPS USAID UNVIE UAE UNFICYP UNODC UNCHS UNIDROIT UNDESCO UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 04MONTREAL1484, US-VISIT STAKEHOLDERS/MEDIA BRIEFING IN MONTREAL
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04MONTREAL1484.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04MONTREAL1484 | 2004-11-18 18:04 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Consulate Montreal |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 MONTREAL 001484
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR CA/VO/I JOHN COOK, WHA/CAN AND WHA/PA
DHS FOR US-VISIT ROBERT MOCNY
OTTAWA FOR CONS, PD AND DHS/ICE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CVIS ELTN ECON PBTS CA
SUBJECT: US-VISIT STAKEHOLDERS/MEDIA BRIEFING IN MONTREAL
¶1. Summary. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) US-VISIT
Deputy Director Robert Mocny provided two US-VISIT briefings
on November 5 to stakeholders (shippers, customs brokers,
Canadian immigration officers) and media, respectively. All
attendees were provided a handout: "Fact Sheet: U.S. Land
Borders." The briefings went very well, and most attendees
appeared relieved to have it reiterated that Canadian
citizens who do not need visas are not yet subject to the
program. Post is considering the possibility of holding a
followup US-VISIT digital videoconference (DVC) with
stakeholders not included in the November 5 briefings.
(Notetakers were ConSec Officers Stephen Ashby and Maya
Harris.) End summary.
¶2. Stakeholders Briefing. Mr. Mocny described the
methodology and implementation schedule for the US-VISIT
program. He cited four key DHS goals for US-VISIT:
- To enhance security of U.S. citizens and visitors
- To facilitate legitimate trade and travel
- To ensure integrity of U.S. immigration system
- To protect privacy of visitors
Mr. Mocny also detailed to stakeholders the Congressional
mandates driving the US-VISIT implementation and the methods
for redressing any errors that visitors may find in US-VISIT
records pertaining to them.
¶3. Stakeholders' Briefing: Questions and Answers.
a. What provisions are being made for exit recording and
control?
Answer: None will be immediately put into place, but the
plan is to test radio frequency (RF) checking of "exit
receipts" at 7 trial ports of entry (POE) in June-July 2005.
Future plans include biometric verification of exiting
visitors.
b. What about passports that get stolen before biometrics
are established at a POE for an individual?
Answer: If the perpetrator used the stolen travel document,
he/she would be biometrically recorded. Subsequently, when
the legitimate traveler is screened, the traveler would be
required to prove identity while in the secondary interview
and the bad guy would be added to the impostor watch-list.
c. What prevents terrorists from just using Canadian IDs to
avoid US-VISIT?
Answer: We rely on Canadian officials to safeguard against
terrorists and other bad guys getting legitimate
identification (ID). Inspectors also guard against their
entry.
d. Will US-VISIT profile any race or ethnicity?
Answer: No. Everyone, except U.S. and Canadian citizens who
do not need visas, must be screened.
e. So, Visa Waiver Program folks will undergo US-VISIT, even
on charters?
Answer: Yes.
f. Will US-VISIT increase information sharing between U.S.
and Canadian security and law enforcement?
Answer: Not formally, but all the current information-
sharing arrangements still apply.
¶4. Media Briefing. Media representation included most major
organizations, such as CBC, The Gazette, TQS, Le Devoir and
Canadian Press. US-VISIT Deputy Director Robert Mocny
provided an overview of the basic elements of the US-VISIT
Program, outlined the DHS goals in US-VISIT implementation
and summarized the program's applicability for prospective
visitors.
¶5. Media Briefing: Questions and Answers.
a. Why were airports the first to implement US-VISIT?
(Note. The reporter who posed the question stated that if
she were a terrorist or anyone else attempting to escape the
notice of border officials then she would "definitely
attempt to enter the U.S. via land." End note.)
Answer: Mocny stated that DHS adhered to deadlines decided
by the U.S. Congress after the law making body appropriated
$100 million for the program. Mocny listed the deadlines,
beginning with the benchmark December 31, 2003, date to
launch US-VISIT at all Canadian airport POEs, then the 17
busiest land POEs by December 31, 2004, followed by all POEs
by December 31, 2005.
b. How will US-VISIT affect landed immigrants and Canadian
citizens?
Answer: Mocny emphasized that US-VISIT will have minimal
impact on landed immigrants (LI), as they presently already
report to border officials for secondary interview.
According to Mocny, the only changes LIs will face are the
biometric fingerprint scan and facial imaging. He added
that pilot programs at the Sarnia and Port Huron POEs have
shown there is no "real" added inconvenience to LIs.
Further, he stated LIs may even experience fewer delays at
POEs because US-VISIT eliminates the need for prospective
U.S. visitors to complete Form I-94. Mocny underscored that
the pilot programs at Sarnia and Port Huron, and the
implementation of US-VISIT at Canadian airports, have been
successful and important to creating a secure medium to
collect biographic data on potential U.S. visitors (one that
also guards against identity theft).
c. How will US-VISIT affect Canadians with dual
citizenship?
Answer: Dual nationals who declare either their Canadian or
American citizenship while presenting the appropriate
corroborating identification at POEs will not be affected by
US-VISIT. However, visitors to the U.S. who claim
citizenship to a third country upon arrival at the POE will
be subject to US-VISIT and may be expected to take part in a
secondary interview.
d. Does DHS have plans to begin fingerprinting and
photographing Canadian citizens?
Answer: Mocny stated that DHS understands that in addition
to securing the border, the cross border economy still has
to be maintained and that DHS recognizes that most people
(at least 80%) who cross the US-Canadian border do not have
malicious intentions. However, Mocny further stated DHS
does not believe the border is secure; that the majority of
people stopped through US-VISIT were taken into secondary
inspection because of possible intent to overstay their
visit in the U.S. and that many people with criminal
convictions have been apprehended through the program. He
noted that while presently the only Canadians who must
participate in US-VISIT are those that require visas (i.e.
fianc(e)s of American citizens, immigrants, treaty-trade
investors), the 9/11 Commission made specific
recommendations on the possible need to include Canadians in
security measures.
e. Is it true all Canadians will require a passport to
enter the U.S. as of December 31? If not, have discussions
on the creation of a continental card resumed?
Answer: Mocny stated that DHS has no current plan to require
Canadians to bear passports at U.S. borders, but that this
may be subject to change based upon the will of the U.S.
Congress. Regarding a continental-wide identification,
Mocny stated that while that remains an option for the
future, speculation would not be useful.
f. Will US-VISIT target minorities?
Answer: Mocny stated that the only foreign nationals not
subject to US-VISIT at POEs are Canadians, a facet of the
program that will ensure that everyone is treated equally.
He went on to state while Canadians are exempt from US-VISIT
at present, only time will tell whether Canadians will
remain exempt from program participation.
g. What happens to the biographic data that is collected
from US-VISIT?
Answer: Mocny replied that the data collected would be
distributed within DHS as needed. He added that an
inquiring foreign national would have access to the list of
U.S. governmental entities that has access to their
information. Mocny stated there is no plan to share the
information collected from US-VISIT with Canadian officials
and that the collection of biographic data through US-VISIT
has allowed DHS to track the length of visits of foreign
nationals to the U.S.
h. Will the implementation of US-VISIT have any impact on
the American traveler?
Answer: Mocny stated that US-VISIT will have no effect on
the average American traveler.
i. Post 9/11--should Canadians get accustomed to the idea
that they will eventually be subject to programs similar to
US-VISIT?
Answer: Mocny reaffirmed that the only change in the
procedural status quo was the launch of US-VISIT at the 17
busiest land POEs, expected to be fully operational by the
December 31, 2004, deadline. He added that while U.S.
policy may change in the future, he could not speculate on
those potential changes.
¶6. Post is considering the possibility of conducting a
followup US-VISIT DVC, as we had insufficient lead time to
notify other stakeholders (ie., representatives from the
Visa Waiver Program countries' Consulates General in our
district, other travel and trade-related contacts) who may
have benefited from the November 5 briefing.
ALLEN